ALJ can compel a claimant to sign a medical release

by Matthew H. Ammerman on September 7th, 2018

Medical records are essential to handling LHWCA claims. But they are not always easy to get. In Mugerwa v. Aegis Defense Servs., 52 BRBS 11 (April 27, 2018), the Benefits Review Board holds administrative law judges (ALJs) have the authority to compel claimants to sign narrowly-tailored medical releases when it is reasonable under the circumstances to do so.

A claimant puts his or her medical condition at issue when a LHWCA claim is filed.[1] The Act gives an ALJ broad powers to inquire fully into the matters at issue.[2] And the scope of discovery before the ALJ includes “any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense….”[3] Therefore, the employer and its carrier have a right to medical records relevant to the claim that is made.

In Mugerwa, the carrier’s need for a signed medical release was compelling. It did not have subpoena power over the claimant’s medical records in Uganda. It needed the release to get those records. The Board held that the ALJ had the power to make the claimant a medical release. But, the releases at issue were overbroad. The Board remanded the case. On remand, the ALJ must first determine if the records at issue were relevant. If so, the releases had to be narrowly tailored to the claimants’ medical records that bear on his claim and exclude information regarding non-medical providers or the records of the claimant’s beneficiaries. If the claimant refused to agree upon a tailored release, the ALJ could compel him to sign a one.

That is helpful if a case is referred up to the U.S. Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ). But what if the case is before the District Director? A carrier has no way to compel a claimant sign a medical release. Instead, the carrier’s counsel can order a subpoena from the OALJ in Washington, D.C., for relevant records from a specific provider. Alternately, have the case referred up for formal discovery and a hearing with an ALJ if warranted by the seriousness of the claim. Be warned, however, that you need to be ready to try the case as well.

[1] See, e.g., McKnight v. Blanchard, 667 F.2d 477, 482 (5th Cir. 1982) (discussing discoverability of medical records in injury claim).
[2] 33 U.S.C. § 927(a); 20 C.F.R. § 702.338.
[3] 29 CFR § 18.51.



Posted in Discovery    Tagged with LHWCA discovery, ALJ

Search

Subscribe

follow on
Tags

11th circuit 5th Circuit 905(b) 9th circuit ALJ Aggravation Rule Amclyde Average weekly wage Bienvenu Boroski CMS Churchill Contribution Cowart Credit Intoxication defense L-MSA LHWCA discovery LHWCA Longshore Report of Injury Longshore situs Longshore Maintenance and cure New Orleans Depot OCSLA OPA Oil Pollution Act Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act Permanent total disability Roberts Section 10(a) Section 10(c) Section 20 Presumption Section 33(g) Section 7 Medical Section 7 Stroke Supreme Court Testbank Townsend Tracy Valladolid actually incurred additional insured adjoining area change of physician compensation container repair disability doiron dollar-for-dollar dr. seidemann eggshell skull exclusion extraterritorial general maritime law hearing loss herron factors indemnity intervening cause jones act joseph tracy last responsible employer rule liability MSA longshore act longshore status manderson maritime contract maritime punitive damages master service agreement maximum compensation rate mcbride v. estis mcbride medical expenses naquin non-pecuniary damages occupational disease outer continental shelf pai or incurred paid or incurred pecuniary damages percentage of responsibility presumption punitive damages ramos rate rebuttal recreational vessel seaman status seaman situs special weight status substantial nexus transitory maritime worker unseaworthiness vessel negligence vessel status voluntary retirement winchester test winchester zepeda mixed-use facility zepeda